中国有能力对抗美国在亚太地区的军事部署

　　在中国，有关军事的方方面面都是机密。甚至包括部队食堂的午餐菜单。西方分析人士发现，中国最近的导弹项目可以有效对抗台湾购买的美国货。

　　1996年以来，中国的“A2/AD”武器开始出现，它是反介入和区域封锁武器，对美国维持亚太地区稳定的关键战略目标构成重要挑战。封锁进入西太平洋地区的通道，或遏制在这片重要海域行动的能力。A2/AD系统对美国力量投射主要手段构成了威胁，包括它的基地、海上和空中资产，以及支持它们的网络。

　　由于美国航母在亚洲的出现激怒了北京方面，为此中国全力阻止美国军事行动。

　　A2/AD武器并不局限于一种武器系统或战术，而是包括一系列涵盖多个领域的交叠能力。中国新型反舰弹道导弹，特别值得注意的是，其新型反舰弹道导弹是精确制导常规导弹，可击中海上航母及其他舰艇。

　　DF-21D反航母弹道导弹

　　美国海军官员表示，美国正想办法应对中国的DF-21D。其中一个可能的解决方案是SLQ-32电子系统。几乎每一艘美国海军军舰都安装有这样的系统。分析师不确定这些SLQ-59目的是为应对中国的反舰弹道导弹和反舰巡航导弹的威胁，还有部分的美国海军使用水面电子战改进计划。

　　在1月11日，美国太平洋司令部做出了一个快速的决定，要求舰艇使用24 SLQ-59电子系统。主要是由于新发现的威胁，该系统可以在极短的时间为舰艇提供防护能力。

　　中国也一直在研制反卫星导弹破坏或摧毁美国卫星。根据新加坡国防和战略研究学院的研究，中国的惯性聚变激光项目，旨在利用高能激光束产生持续的核聚变反应打击对手的武器装备。可能有两个军事应用是中国的下一代热核武器和激光武器计划。

　　中国的“A2/AD”武器可以远离美国而进行军事打击，摧毁对手。同时，中国复杂而先进的地下设施也可以阻止美国自战争时期的进攻。美国的隐形F- 22战斗机和B - 2轰炸机可以对中国进行报复。

　　B – 2战机的研制公司罗普·格鲁曼公司工程师戈瓦迪亚，在2010年被定罪，他向中国提供的雷达红外制导导弹，可以对B - 2隐形机进行追踪，同时发生导弹。

　　其他迹象显示中国正在研制高性能雷达，识别隐形飞机。中国也已经从乌克兰获得了Kolchuga传感器电子战系统和移动空域监视雷达。

　　其自主验证的YLC-20双站监视雷达可以对400千米内的目标进行探测。也有迹象表明，中国计划采购俄罗斯S - 400枚地对空导弹系统，射程400公里。中国自主开发S - 300陆基导弹移动系统。

　　S - 400地对空导弹

　　B - 2隐形机

　　即使美国可以逃脱中国的导弹打击，还必须找到并摧毁地下设施，而这一点很难做到。中国的地下设施项目极为机密。为了使这些设施得以生存，中国投以巨资，在现代战场上使用古老的防御方法。

　　原文：

　　China Pursues Systems To Keep US Forces at Bay

　　AIPEI — Though everything in China’s military is classified secret， including lunch menus at base canteens， Western analysts have been able to peel away some of the secrecy of several programs geared at defeating a US military campaign in the South China Sea or a Taiwan scenario.

　　Anti-access/area-denial （A2/AD） has become a focal point for China’s military since 1996， when the US sent two aircraft carrier groups as a show of support for Taiwan during Chinese missile tests designed to intimidate voters. The deployment of the aircraft carriers enraged Beijing， leading to efforts to deter US military operations that challenge China in the future.

　　The most obvious A2/AD program under development is the DF-21D anti-ship ballistic missile （ASBM）， which has entered the initial operational capability stage.

　　The missile is unique in that no other country has successfully developed a conventional ballistic missile capable of hitting a ship. There is a debate within the Western analytical community about whether this missile is capable of performing this task without the proper targeting satellites and electronic countermeasures.

　　US Navy officials have said they are working on ways of defeating the DF-21D along the kill chain. One possible solution is a plan to replace the AN/SLQ-32 electronic warfare system， which is aboard nearly every US Navy warship， with a prototype system dubbed SLQ-59. Analysts are unsure whether the SLQ-59 is intended as a counter to China’s ASBM and anti-ship cruise missile threats， or is simply part of the US Navy’s Surface Electronic Warfare Improvement Program （SEWIP）， possibly the SLQ-32 Block 3T （Transportable EW Module）。

　　In a document dated Jan. 11， the US Pacific Command made an “unusual and compelling urgency” request for 24 prototype SLQ-59s. The document stated that this is a “priority effort due to a newly discovered threat and the need to provide a protective capability to naval ships and their crews in a critically short timeframe.”

　　“Based on the law of averages， truth to be found somewhere in the middle， no doubt，” said Bob Nugent， vice president of advisory services at AMI

　　China also has been developing anti-satellite missiles and lasers designed to damage or destroy US satellites. According to Michael Raska， a research fellow at the Singapore-based Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies， China is working on the Shenguang （“Divine Light”） laser project for inertial confinement fusion， which aims to use high-powered lasers to produce a sustained nuclear fusion reaction.

　　Raska said the program — officially designated as an alternative energy project — could have two military applications： improving China’s next-generation thermonuclear weapons and advancing its directed-energy laser weapon programs.

　　China’s A2/AD strategy is intended to force the US military to operate farther from the mainland and make it difficult for US strike missions to knock out China’s military eyes and ears.

　　China’s massive complex of advanced underground facilities is part of the effort to impede the US from destroying command-and-control nodes during a war. Any attempt by the US to use its stealthy F-22 fighter jets and B-2 bombers to cripple underground facilities would face China’s ongoing attempts to defeat stealth technology.

　　This includes stealth technology acquired by espionage， such as B-2 secrets provided by former Northrop Grumman engineer Noshir Gowadia and others. Gowadia， whom the US convicted in 2010， provided China with the lock-on range for infrared-guided missiles against the B-2 and information that allowed China to develop a low-signature cruise missile exhaust system.

　　There also are other indications China is developing radar capabilities that will allow it to identify and shoot down stealth aircraft. This includes the development of meter-wave， passive over-the-horizon radar and infrared countermeasures in cooperation with the Ukraine-based Lviv Radiotechnical Science and Research Institute and the Iskra Scientific and Production Complex， said Vasiliy Kashin， a China military specialist at the Moscow-based Centre for Analysis of Strategies and Technologies.

　　China also has acquired Kolchuga passive sensor electronic warfare systems and mobile 3-D 36D6-M1 airspace surveillance radars from Ukraine， he said.

　　China’s new YLC-20 two-station passive surveillance radar is possibly a copy of the Czech VERA-E system. There also are indications China plans to procure the 400-kilometer-range Russian S-400 surface-to-air missile system， which for the first time would give China complete air defense coverage of Taiwan. China uses the indigenously developed HQ-9 and Russian-built S-300 land-based mobile systems.

　　Even if US bombing missions can escape China’s improving surface-to-air missile capabilities， the US still must locate and destroy the underground facilities that reportedly make up hundreds of miles of tunnels throughout China.

　　China’s underground facility program is “by its very nature inherently strategic and secretive，” said Ian Easton， a researcher at the Project 2049 Institute. To make those facilities survivable， China has invested a “tremendous level” of resources to “adapt an ancient defense method to a modern battlefield，” he said.