对于美国导弹巡洋舰“考本斯”号硬闯中国辽宁舰航母编队内防区，有美国军事战略专家16号在华盛顿称，美国海军有权利在中国南海海域航行，中国派舰艇阻挠是冒险主义行为，负责人员应该被撤职。美国前驻华大使芮效俭则表示，中美应该建立《防止公海意外事件协定》。 美国战略与国际研究中心军事战略专家鲁瓦克表示，中国与美国的舰船都有权利在南海航行，防止冲撞的正常距离一般只有几英里，而不是中方指出的40公里。在过去，前苏联的船只总是会近距离尾随美国的航母，但从来没有发生过意外事件，因为前苏联军方没有冒险主义的行为，一旦奉行冒险主义的指挥官会被撤职。 美国战略与国际研究中心军事战略专家鲁瓦克：我并不认为那天命令登陆舰去阻挠考本斯号的人会被撤职。美国与前苏联之所以没有发生冲突的原因就是奉行冒险主义的指挥官会被撤职。但是在中国不会。这令人担忧。 而前美国驻华大使芮效俭指出，中美军方正在低调处理此次事件，芮效俭认为侦查是各国海军都从事的行为，而中美应该建立防止公海意外事件协定。 前美国驻华大使芮效俭：美国与俄罗斯人通过谈判达成了《防止公海意外事件协定》，建立了基本准则防止抵近侦查带来的极大危险。直到现在中国都没有对建立此种协定表达出兴趣。我认为这次事件带来的有益的结果可能是重新产生这种兴趣，来建立一些基本准则。 美国专家还指出，近期中国与周边国家频繁发生摩擦，而这或许也给各方通过对话，解决问题提供了契机。 WASHINGTON （Reuters） - A U.S. guided missile cruiser operating in international waters in the South China Sea was forced to take evasive action last week to avoid a collision with a Chinese navy ship maneuvering nearby， the U.S. Pacific Fleet said in a statement on Friday. 美国太平洋舰队在星期五的一份声明中称，上周一艘在南海公海水域内航行的美国导弹驱逐舰被迫避让一艘在附近行驶的中国海军舰艇，以免发生碰撞。 The incident on December 5 involving the USS Cowpens came at a time of heightened tensions between the United States and China following Beijing‘s declaration of an AirDefense Identification Zone in the East China Sea. 12月5号发生的事件涉及到USS Cowpens，恰逢中美之间因北京设立东海防空识别区而处于关系紧张的时期。 译注：USS Cowpens（CG-63）是一艘提康德罗加级巡洋舰（美军正式使用的第一种宙斯盾舰），二战期间有一艘同名轻型航母（CVL-25）。该舰1991年服役，03年伊拉克战争时是第一个发射导弹的舰艇，本来计划今年早些时候退役的。最近几年因为该舰热心参加各种救灾活动和救灾演习（最近菲律宾这也有她的身影），有时候被戏称为补给舰。 The Pacific Fleet statement did not offer details about what led to the near-collision. But it did say the incident underscored the need for the “highest standards of professional seamanship， including communications between vessels， to mitigate the risk of an unintended incident or mishap.” 太平洋舰队的声明并未提供险些相撞的情况如何出现的细节。但强调称这一事件说明需要重视“包括舰艇通讯在内的最顶尖的航海技术，以规避发生故障或事故的风险”。 Beijing declared the air defense zone over the East China Sea late last month and demanded that aircraft flying through the area provide it with flight plans and other information. 上周北京宣布在东海设立防空识别区，要求飞临该区域的飞行器提供飞行计划和其他信息。 The United States and its allies rejected the Chinese demand and have continued to fly military aircraft into the zone， which includes air space over a small group of islands claimed by China but currently administered by Tokyo. 美国及其盟友抵制中国的要求，一直派遣军用飞机飞入该区域，该区域囊括了一小片中国声索但目前由日本控制的岛屿。 In the midst of the tensions over the air defense zone， China deployed its only aircraft carrier， the Liaoning， to the South China Sea for maneuvers. Beijing claims most of the South China Sea and is involved in territorial disputes in the region with several of its neighbors. 在围绕防空识别区产生的紧张局势中，中国部署其唯一一艘航母辽宁号前往南海演习。北京声索该地区大部分区域的主权，并卷入了与几个邻居之间的领土纷争。 （Reporting by David Alexander; Editing by Jim Loney） 以下评论 Anthony 9 minutes ago 0 2 A U.S. guided missile cruiser operating in international waters in the South China Sea was forced to take evasive action - 一艘在南海公海水域内航行的美国导弹驱逐舰被迫避让…… 这太荒唐了。世界最强的海军被迫避让……在公海水域？ 要是美国再不教训一下胆敢拦住她去路的中国船只……中国就会一遍又一遍的玩这一套…… 但是话说回来，美军实际上受一位只会耍耍嘴皮子的总司令指挥。所以美国战舰在中国战舰面前永远只会-紧急避让-。 ppfftt 7 hours ago 3 90 Just posturing and playing chicken， like the cold war days with the ruskies and their AGI（automatic gain intercept）， ， new people getting their power play rocks off. Back in the 70’s you very seldom heard about it， but it was a constant in some areas. Google russian navy US Navy collisions. 只是故作姿态吓唬人罢了，就像当年冷战的时候对付毛子和他们的AGI（自动增益拦截）。他们把情报收集船设计成渔船的样式，有时候他们直接从一支舰队中间穿过去。 我们的海军还和俄国船只互相照射火控雷达呢，想当年峥嵘岁月，好像又随着中国人一起回来了。 没什么大不了的，只是新的家伙在玩权力的游戏。回想上世纪70年代这种事虽然很少听说，但在某些地区是日常事件了。 谷歌一下俄美海军撞击事件。 译注：美俄军舰曾两次相撞，分别发生在1988和2008年，两次都是毛子故意撞击美舰，两次都打出旗语：“我舰奉命向你撞击”。美国佬一定很囧…… nofooln 7 hours ago 12 19 Wrong. China‘s claims over the China Sea have been limited to rhetoric in the past. The declaration of a security zone and provocative actions by their military are serious escalations not to be taken lightly. Those who think this is just harmless posturing are in for a rude awakening when China ups the ante down the road， and they will. 不对。以前中国对中国海域的主权声索仅限于嘴炮。现在他们设立安全区和军队的挑衅行为变得日益严峻，不容忽视。觉得这不过是无害的姿态的人将来会被中国更大的胃口惊醒，等着瞧吧。 JN 7 hours ago 0 3 Not what “AGI” stands for 。..。 AGI是虾米玩意呐…… Ray 5 hours ago 3 17 I hope that the Chinese don’t make a very costly mistake. War with the US and i am sure that all trade with them would come to an immediate halt. 希望中国不要铸下大错。和美国开战的话他们的外贸就会被通通切断。 Russell 4 hours ago 5 4 nofooln you‘re your a fool. Read a little history of the Cold War. It’s just more of the same. 不，你真是很傻很天真。看一点冷战历史吧，现在的情况何其相似。 Scifiguy 4 hours ago 3 10 Biggest difference between the Chinese now as compared to the USSR back in the day. We didn‘t owe trillions to the USSR， the USSR didn’t have the ability to destroy our financialmarkets！ 现在的中国和过去的苏联之间最大的差别是，我们不欠苏联几十亿，苏联没有能力毁灭我们的金融市场！ mike 4 hours ago 0 4 Yup， I remember the good ol days when those TRAWLERS were known to us as thegarbage collectors， when I was on the ， at that time the Russians did not even know how to unrep ！ I bet the Chinese don‘t now ！ Well， they don’t even have blue water AOE‘s ！ 是啊，我还记得以前的好日子，我们把那些拖网渔船叫做垃圾收集器。我走在路中间丢垃圾，他们跟在后面屁颠屁颠地全捡起来，哈哈！ 他们靠近到离我们只有几十码远，我们都能看清他们的脸，一群身处印度洋中间的可怜虫，坐在扛着大号天线的小船里。那时候俄国人甚至都没有航行间补给设备！我打赌中国人也不知道！他们甚至没有远洋快速作战支援舰！ Robert 2 hours ago 0 2 Thanks for the heads up on US/Russian naval collisions. I worked in a naval shipyard from 1976 to 1995 and wasn’t aware of this. Whenever they‘d tow a ship in for major below-the-waterline repairs， we were told that we’d run into our own ships and/or submarines. No one I knew ever questioned this. 还要多谢俄美海军撞击事件。1976到1995年间我在造船厂工作，之前没听说过这事。每次他们把一艘船拖进来做水线下大修，都告诉我们撞上了自己人的的船或者潜艇。我认识的人都没怀疑过。 Robert 7 hours ago 8 302 I‘m curious how naval ships that travel maybe up to 45 nautical mph and have radar andsonar that can see vast miles all around can almost collide？ It sounds more like a game of chicken. 我很好奇时速45海里、配备有探测范围超远的雷达和声呐的军舰怎么可能几乎撞在一起？这事听起来像是一种恐吓。 foo 3 hours ago 1 47 Obviously the Chinese ship was - um - made in China. 显然中国军舰是，饿，中国造的。 George 6 hours ago 11 5 Propably the American as well. 没准美国船也有中国制造。 MadeMyOwnWay 6 hours ago 1 5 and painted with lead based paint. I’d rather be in a Japanese built fishing boat than a Chinese made warship; better chance of surviving on the open sea. 上面还涂有含铅涂料。我宁愿待在日本渔船上也不要待在中国战舰上，前者在大海上活下来的可能性更大。 Raymond 6 hours ago 0 3 With all that lead in that ship being made in China how is it afloat？ 船上那么些中国制造的铅，是怎么浮起来的？ SFODA 6 hours ago 0 2 Actually， it was made in the Ukraine during the Soviet days. 实际上，那艘船是苏联时期在乌克兰建造的。 |
Powered by Discuz! X3.4
Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.
